Today on CMR — September 2, 2010

Pro-Lifers Face to Face With The Discovery Gunman?
—Pro-lifers Video Encounter with the Discovery Gunman...

The Cone Of Uncertainty
—Hurricanes you can prepare for, children not so much.

An Amazing WWII Story
—Humanity in war.

Kookaburra's Not Gay...Anymore
—Your seven year old needs to know about homosexuality because of a bird.

Reagan's Address on Adoption and Abortion
—Moving.

Catholics for Vuvuzelas
—The Church bans something else?

US News: Right to Life Isn't a Human Right
—Attacking Alveda King.

Pawlenty To Obamacare--Nope!
—We don't need no stinking Obamacare!

Tuesdays With Fr. Barron: The Our Father
—Video series.



Bus Ads to Pope: Ordain Womyn!
—Still waiting for that bus.

Talk of God Inappropriate in Sacred Space
—Secularism makes you stupid.

Poll: Churchgoers Don't Approve of Obama
—YOu mean he's not the Obamessiah?!!!

The Future of Seton Hall University
—A Catholic school in danger of losing its Catholicism?

President Remote Control
—He doesn't get it.

Compassionate Cannibalism
—Arms for the poor.

TwitterCounter for

Pro-Lifers Face to Face With The Discovery Gunman?

Katie Walker of the American Life League said that she believes she met the Discovery Channel gunman James Lee face to face last year on June 6, 2009 for the national event called "The Pill Kills" day where they argued about the importance of human life.

I spoke with Katie Walker and exchanged emails with her this morning. She said: "Last year American Life League sponsored a national event called the Pill Kills Day on June 6, 2009. During the Washington DC events for the day - which took place at the Planned Parenthood on 16th St. - an Asian man wearing a khaki/brown hat and coat stuck a flip cam in three of our faces and started arguing with us about abortion and population control. He later uploaded the video he made to YouTube under the name "Dcprotests." His youtube profile says he is 43 years old."

Walker said she gave the videos to the Montgomery County police in the morning so that they can compare the audio to the hostage tapes. After listening to the tapes I can say it sure sounds like the same guy.

Walker said: "I looked this man in the face and argued with him. It's the same guy. Notice especially the last half of the youtube video of his for his take on the value of human being's lives...In our encounter with James J. Lee, he told us that he believes in a philosophy in which human beings are not exceptional in a way in which they should be respected and protected, but that they are exceptional in a negative way, they are a threat to the environment. In our encounter with James – he told us his biggest concern was nuclear war and overpopulation because it hurts the environment. He said that he didn’t care if “you humans kill yourselves with your stupid wars.” We recognize this as a familiar and dangerous philosophy. Disregard for human beings lives compelled us to be outside those Planned Parenthood doors that day. And it seems that James Lee took the disregard and disdain for people, for the harm they do to the environment, and yesterday decided to do something irrational about it."

Walker remembers the man approaching her and other protestors with a small video camera and questioning them antagonistically as an atheist who was admittedly intolerant of religion, and saying "Animals are wonderful creatures...Humans are environmentally destructive and we've got to stop breeding or something."

Here's the video with the argument between the man and the protestors:



You can actually see the man we believe to be Lee filming his video in the background at the Pill Kills protest in these two videos made by "The Pill Kills" protestors:



And you can see him walk past the camera on that same day at about the 1:33 mark.


Some key quotes from the videos from the man who I believe is James Lee:

"I'm an atheist myself."

"I don't tolerate other people's religion because it's unsustainable."

"You can't say that we can breed as many children as we want and that the earth is unlimited. The Earth is limited. You can't just say we have to fill the Earth, have all these children and never mind all the other creatures."

"Having children is harmful too."

When asked about issues he cares about he listed, "nuclear war, overpopulation."

"I don't care if humans destroy yourselves with your stupid wars but you're gonna destroy the natural world. atomic bombs hurt other creatures.you wanna kill yourselves with nuclear weapons that's up to you..."

"Why don't you guys slice each other up with knives but please don't hurt the wildlife...they don't do anybody no harm."

"Animals are wonderful creatures...Humans are environmentally destructive and we've got to stop breeding or something."

The Cone Of Uncertainty

My house lies within the cone of uncertainty. That sounds bad, doesn't it?

As of this writing, my house on the east end of Long Island is on the western edge of the possible path of Hurricane Earl as it heads up the east coat.

I have been watching it all week and preparing. I have already begun removing any potential projectiles (anything not strapped down) from my yard and putting them in the garage.I went to the store days ago to stock up on milk and bread before the rush hit. Since I have five children there is no fear any of it will go to waste.

It has been a while for us Islanders, but we have been through this before. You get prepared and you see what happens. There are certainly spiritual lessons to be taken from situations like this. You must be prepared becuase you don't know when the end will come. The end will come like a thief in the night. In a world with ADT alarm systems and Doppler radar, perhaps we forget this sometimes. We many not have days warning when our end comes like we do with hurricanes. We are not used to surprises any more.

But I was surprised yesterday. I picked my nine year old boy ...

Continue Reading @ The Register

An Amazing WWII Story

Kookaburra's Not Gay...Anymore

Remember that old song about "Kookaburra" sitting in an old gum tree. I sang it in like the second grade. We were awesome. I mean, we knocked Kookaburra out of the park but I'm not here to brag.

Ol' Kookaburra used to be "gay" but one Principal in Australia decided the bird was not "gay" anymore but he was actually just "fun," according to The Blaze.

Good for Kookaburra. It's got to be tough dealing with those feelings for other male birds and getting over it and still being "fun."

Oh wait. That's not what happened.

It's just that the kids giggled everytime the word "gay" was used in the song when the Principal was trying to teach them the song so he changed the word. And some people seem to be getting all upset about it. I don't know, if I heard my kids singing it with the word "fun" instead of "gay" I'd know exactly why the teacher did that. I think I'd appreciate it actually.

One gay advocate said the Principal just set the gay cause back.

Crusader Hillis, CEO of the gay and lesbian advocacy group The Also Foundation, said:

"It sends a signal to people that just because a word has two meanings, that one of those meanings is unacceptable and that's really putting us backwards," Hillis said. "Even if it's done for good intentions because 'gay' is being used in schoolyards as a slur, I think they need to use the word as a conversation rather than banning it."
Yeah, because we want Principals and music teachers teaching seven year olds about homosexuality via Kookaburra.

It kinda' gives a new meaning to teaching the birds and bees. (Sorry.)

Sadly, the Principal is taking the wrong lesson from this and he's said in recent published reports that he's still going to teach "Kookaburra" and have a big lesson about gays surrounding the song. Uhm, why not just pick a different song. It's not like Kookaburra is the "Stairway to Heaven" of kid songs. I mean, seriously, can you imagine your kid's Principal explaining that he had to teach your seven year old kid all about the ins and outs of homosexuality because of Kookaburra?

(Just in case you never learned the song here's a bunch of random kids singing it. They're not half as good as my second grade was. We rocked it.)

Reagan's Address on Adoption and Abortion

Pretty moving stuff about abortion and adoption from President Ronald Reagan. Check it out:

Catholics for Vuvuzelas

First it was contraception, then abortion. Now the Pope wants to ban something else...Vuvuzelas. News reports indicate that Pope Benedict XVI,a former Nazi Youth and former head of the office formerly known as the Inquisition, is now banning the popular musical instrument which brought millions joy during the World Cup.

When Pope Benedict XVI visits England he is expected to draw large crowds but the Vatican's ban of vuvuzelas has not come without considerable controversy. (In case you don't know what vuvuzelas are click here)

"Is the Catholic Church just against all fun?" asked one devout Catholic who said he was going to buy a Vuvuzela in protest. "I read somewhere that even Popes back in the...like 1300's used Vuvuzelas all the time or something. So this edict is totally hypocritical."

Some quick polling on the issue showed that American Catholics were split as they are on so many issues. 20 percent of Catholics were for the ban because it is the loudest most annoying sound on Earth, eight percent of Catholic were against the Pope's condemnation while the rest had never watched a soccer match so had no idea what a Vuvuzela was.

So vehement is the outrage against the Pope's stringent ban that a new group was established called "Catholics for Vuvuzelas." The group, which already has 453 Facebook friends, is believed to be a splinter group of "Catholics for Free Choice." The headline banner of the site reads "My Lips, My Choice."

"The Pope has no right to decree that I can't use a....whatever that thing is," said one woman who was raised Catholic. "It's bad enough that the Pope wants to tell us what we can do in our bedroom but to tell us what musical instruments we can use? No way."

When asked if she thought she'd go to Hell for using a vuvuzela she asked, "What's Hell? I'm not familiar with that term."

One church in California was intending to hold a Teen vuvuzela Mass playing the song catalogue of Peter, Paul and Mary but they cancelled the Mass because the guitarists and tambourine players who typically play at the Teen Mass felt slighted and many other said that the vuvuzela was the most annoying sound in the world.

One Teen Mass coordinator said that he believes if someone feels they can get closer to God by using a vuvuzela then they should use it. "Who is the Pope to outlaw someone's spiritual free expression, man?"

He said he went to see his pastor shortly after the shocking announcement and his priest told him that everyone must ultimately follow their own conscience when it comes to vuvuzelas.

A spokesperson for the United Nations said they may consider funding the distribution of vuvuzelas to Third World countries. Of course, they'll also put condoms inside.

US News: Right to Life Isn't a Human Right

Bonne Erbe of US News and World Report was attempting to discredit Alveda King calling her tacky and other precious names for being pro-life. Classy, huh?

King compared abortion to racism and incurred the wrath of liberal columnists everywhere. But most lib media types try to dress up their views to make themselves seem at least a little mainstream. Not the filter-less Erbe though. But that's why we like her so much. Every thought that she has she writes down.

But check out Erbe's logic here:

Sorry, but abortion rights and racism simply are not comparable. Racism is unacceptable and violates a basic human right. Abortion is quite something else again. I support abortion rights but I'm not sure I would go so far as to call it a human rights issue. We way overuse the terms "human right" or "civil right" to the point where everyone claims something they want and don't have is a civil right. We are at the point where the terms are so overused, they have become meaningless. But to equate abortion with racism is so way out of whack with reality, it says more about the person using the terms interchangeably, than it does about either of those issues.
What?! No seriously, What?!

What, other than a human right, could abortion be about? We're saying the the unborn are humans and have a right to life. Even if you're against what we're saying we're clearly talking about a human right.

And now that I'm thinking about this I'm wondering what other kinds of rights are there other than human rights? Is there a difference between a right as delineated by the Constitution and "human rights?" How does Erbe make the distinction?

Pawlenty To Obamacare--Nope!

Sometimes good policy makes good politics.

Minnesota’s Governor Tim Pawlenty, via executive order, told state employees "We don't need no stinkin' Obamacare." From Star Tribune via Hotair:

Republican Gov. Tim Pawlenty Tuesday ordered all state agencies to not to submit applications to any health care funding from the federal government related to the health care overhaul.

Any applications must be either required by law or approved by the governor’s office. …

“Obamacare is an intrusion by the federal government into personal health care matters and it’s an explosion of federal spending that does nothing to make health care more affordable,” Pawlenty said in a news release.
If a state doesn't take the money, Obamacare is dead in the water. Once you take the money, they own you.

This is a tactic that more governors should and hopefully will use.

Some people have noted that this move is a broadside against Mitt "RomneyCare" Romney as much as it is against Obamacare. So be it. RomneyCare is a disaster and Romney should be saddled with it. No real conservative would ever do what Romney did. Can we get over it? Maybe. But this is where the debate should be.

That said, this is the right policy. Deny the Feds their leverage by not accepting the money. Governors, pay attention. Lawsuits are fine and they should be tried. But cut off the finding and you cut off Obamacare.

I have my issues with Pawlenty, but this is the right move.

Tuesdays With Fr. Barron: The Our Father

Bus Ads to Pope: Ordain Womyn!

Pope Benedict XVI is going to go to England, see the side of a bus and change the entire church because you know the best advice in life always comes from the side of a bus. That's what some womyn's group is hoping will happen when the Pope goes to England.

Reuters:

One group of women, Catholic Women's Ordination (CWO), will have its message plastered on the side of the buses as they travel along key routes, including past Westminster Hall, at the Palace of Westminster, where the pope is set to deliver a speech to Britain's civic society on September 17.

The group has paid 15,000 pounds ($23,130) for 15 buses to carry the message "Pope Benedict - Ordain Women Now!" for a month.

"We do not want to be disruptive, but I think the church has got to change or it will not survive," CWO spokeswoman Pat Brown told Reuters.
So they have the best interests of the Church at heart, right? Not their own interest?

These liberal groups keep thinking that the Church is like the government that if they keep pushing and yelling they'll eventually get their way. They think they just have to wait -kinda' like waiting for a bus that was scheduled to come in the 1960's but they're going to keep on waiting.

My advice - Keep waiting for that bus. It might be a while. Settle in. Grab a book. Why not make it the Catholic Catechism?

Talk of God Inappropriate in Sacred Space

There has been a lot of commentary on Glenn Beck's "restoring honor" rally in Washington this past weekend. President Obama ignored it. Newscasters spun it. And people argued over the size of it.

But hands down, the silliest thing anyone has said on this topic (and maybe any topic) comes from the politically liberal commentator Bill Press.

As the topic turned to the rally, it was noted that most of the rally focused on a return to God and patriotism.

Speaking on CNN, Press said that speaking about God in a 'sacred' space like the Lincoln Memorial is 'inappropriate.'...

Continue Reading >>>>

Poll: Churchgoers Don't Approve of Obama

Weasel Zippers has a story about a poll indicating that only 34% of "Churchgoers" approve of Obama. But to be fair even the non-churchgoers aren't crazy about him:

Support among Obama’s far-left Godless base beginning to erode?…

Even the unchurched are losing faith in Barack Obama’s handling of the presidency, according to the latest data from the Gallup poll.

When Obama was inaugurated last year, Americans who said they never or seldom go to church were more likely to approve of the job he was doing as president than Americans who said they attended church every week or Americans who said they attended church nearly weekly or monthly.
Check out Weasel Zippers for the rest of the story>>>

The Future of Seton Hall University

We don't typically do stuff like this but CMR friend Amy Giglio wrote in about her concerns with Seton Hall University. She seemed to know a lot about the university and its issues. While she asked CMR to write something up about it I thought readers would be better served by someone with her knowledge base. So I asked Amy to write up her concerns and she wrote back that she would. And this is what she wrote. In reading it I learned a lot about Seton Hall. But I think it has relevance beyond just one school. I believe right now that many Catholic schools are in danger of losing their Catholicism. So check out this story by Amy Giglio:

It seems there is a quiet battle going on behind the iron gates of Seton Hall University: a battle for the university’s soul.

The Division 1 men’s basketball program has endured a very dark off-the-court stretch, a new class is being offered by a member of the faculty who operates clearly and loudly at odds with Church teaching, and a year-long search for a new president has turned out fruitless. All of these things are circling in the air over these 58 acres of South Orange, NJ. Is Seton Hall’s soul dead, or merely on life support?

Seton Hall University is the oldest and largest diocesan university in the United States. Founded in 1856, just three years after the founding of the Diocese of Newark, NJ, Bishop James Roosevelt Bayley, established Seton Hall University to fill the need for a Catholic university within the diocese. He named the university for his aunt, Elizabeth Ann Seton, a Catholic convert who established the Sisters of Charity of St. Joseph in Emmitsburg, MD to care for and educate poor children. Mother Seton would be the first American-born saint, canonized in 1975.

What’s been going on at The Hall lately?

1. Basketball madness: In April, 2006, Seton Hall Univeristy announced that Bobby Gonzalez, a coach known for his passion and explosive temper, would lead its Divison I, Big East men’s basketball program. In the four years he was there, Gonzalez did bring the better connections with local high school coaches that the university was looking for (National High School basketball powerhouses St. Anthony’s and St. Patrick’s are within 12 miles of campus.), but he alienated those same coaches and he also brought in some questionable transfer students who had run-ins with the law while enrolled at SHU. One was arrested for drunk driving the wrong way on the Garden State Parkway. Another punched a player on the opposing team below the belt during a game. A third, after having been kicked off the team, duct taped 8 people, some of whom were former teammates, and robbed them. On March 17, 2010, Gonzalez was fired by SHU President Robert Sheeran, six months after having been granted a contract extension through 2014. Sheeran cited Gonzalez’s conduct and that of his players as cause for termination. Gonzalez sued Seton Hall for wrongful termination shortly after he was fired, and Seton Hall countersued. The cases were settled out of court on August 25, 2010. No details of the settlement were released.

Seton Hall’s men’s basketball team has been the big team at the University. When any college’s or university’s basketball team does well in the NCAA tournament, its national profile is higher and it typically sees a sizable jump in admissions applications, which can translate into more qualified students and more money for the university. But at what cost? Bobby Gonzalez was a questionable choice for Seton Hall from the start. He’s intense, but was his brand of intensity a good fit for a Catholic university? Don’t Catholic colleges and universities have to hold themselves and their employees and students to a higher standard of behavior, modeling themselves on Jesus Christ?

It seems that Seton Hall has learned a lesson from the Gonzalez experience. On March 28, 2010, Seton Hall hired Kevin Willard, a family man who turned around the basketball program at Iona College and who served as Rick Pitino’s assistant with the Boston Celtics and at the University of Louisville. In an interview published on August 24, Willard told ESPN’s Dana O’Neil “When I met with Seton Hall, we talked a lot about behavior, but we also talked about winning and losing. I think you can have both. You can have a program you can be proud of and also have success. That’s what our goal is.”

Is it possible for a Catholic college or university today to have it both ways: to be a national sports powerhouse that is also fully committed to its Catholic identity? Of the colleges and universities who answered the National Catholic Register/Faith and Family Magazine’s 2009 College survey (only 26 schools completed the survey out of about 240 Catholic colleges and universities across the country), none of them have Division I athletic programs.

To look at Division I powerhouse Notre Dame’s decisions over the last 15 years or so, one might be left to wonder if Catholic colleges have their sports and be faithful, too. Certainly there are some members of the theology faculty who are solidly committed to the teaching authority of the Church, but there are others who are not. Notre Dame hosted the play The Vagina Monologues in 2008. And the fact that Notre Dame gave an honorary degree to President Obama in 2009, one of the most vocal proponents of abortion in our nation, and still refuses to drop charges against peaceful protesters might leave some to wonder if a Catholic college can really “have it all.” And if it’s worth having in the first place.

2. Questionable Course Offered: On April 15, 2010, The Setonian, the Seton Hall University student newspaper, published a story about a new course to be offered in fall 2010 on the topic of gay marriage. The course will be taught by Dr. W. King Mott, an openly gay professor in the Women and Gender Studies Department. Mott told the Setonian that this course was not about advocacy, but would take an academic approach to the issue. “I hope my students gain an appreciation and respect for disinterested analysis that can be used to formulate an informed opinion,” Mott told The Setonian.

Upon learning about the course offering, Archbishop Myers asked the University’s Board of Trustees (of which Myers is Chair) and the Board of Regents (of which Myers is president), to review the course. At this time, no official decision has been made on whether or not the course will go forward. The Mission and Identity Committee was supposed to discuss it in June. However, in an article that appeared in the Star-Ledger on August 25, Mott has said that as far as he has been told, the course is still slated to begin in the first week of class and it has about 24 students registered. The University had no official comment to the Star Ledger.

This is not the first time Mott has clashed with the administration of the University. In October 2005, The Star Ledger printed a letter by Mott that criticized the Church’s teaching on homosexuality. Mott signed the letter as the Associate Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences of Seton Hall University. As a result, Mott was removed from his duties as Associate Dean, but was retained as a tenured member of the faculty.

What's interesting about Mott is that his entire professional academic career has been at Catholic Universities. I wonder why that is, especially since he thinks the Church is homophobic:
"The bottom line is, you're talking about a homophobic institution," he said last night. "The Roman Catholic Church is prima facie homophobic. The Roman Catholic Church considers me to be inherently disordered. I don't know how much more homophobic one can be" (Star Ledger October 28, 2005). In this 2005 article, Mott had indicated that he would seek a faculty position elsewhere. Clearly, he is still teaching at Seton Hall.

When I worked at Seton Hall as an admissions counselor 10 years ago, the nursing students were put on rotations in which they would observe abortion procedures. The nursing school made it clear to us at the time that students could opt out of those rotations without penalty, but the question is: why was this part of the nursing curriculum at a Catholic University in the first place?

Catholic Colleges have a right and a grave responsibility to be CATHOLIC. Many parents send their children to, and pay good money for, Catholic universities for a Catholic education. And knowing that, there are many secular colleges and universities which would gladly hire well-qualified professors, like Mott, without caring about what they think about Church teaching.

Seton Hall is a diocesan university, meaning that it is not founded or tied to a particular religious order, but it was founded by the Bishop of Newark and is tied to the diocese in its bylaws. Immaculate Conception Seminary, the diocesan seminary, is located on the campus at SHU. The Archbishop of Newark, Most Rev. John J. Myers, is the chair of the Board of Trustees and is also the Chair of the Board of Regents. Other permanent seats on the Board of Regents are the bishops of the four other dioceses in New Jersey, and other clergy.

One subcommittee of the Board of Regents is the Mission and Identity Committee. “The Mission and Identity Committee shall consider matters referred to the Board of Regents by the Board of Trustees arising from the University’s Catholic mission and identity, giving due consideration to the identity of Catholic institutions of higher education that is described in Ex Corde Ecclesiae (1990). The Committee shall report its recommendations to the Board of Regents” (Seton Hall Univeristy By-laws, Section 2, e, 3).

Why did the Mission and Identity Committee fail to issue a judgment or recommendation on this course? A Catholic University ought to be an oasis for Catholic thought and ideas. Parents should not have to be worried about whether or not a particular Catholic university is really Catholic. Parents should expect that their children will not be put off their faith by the actions of the university. People who are not Catholic should be attracted to a true Catholic University that by its nature would exude Christian love and freedom .

3. Failed presidential search: In June 2009, Msgr. Robert Sheeran announced his intention to resign as the President of Seton Hall University, kicking off a year-long search for a replacement. By the spring of 2010, the committee had chosen two priests as finalists, Msgr. Stuart Swetland and Rev. Kevin Mackin, OFM. Fr. Mackin, currently the president of Mt. St. Mary College in Newburgh, NY, withdrew from consideration shortly after his name was announced, saying that he had decided to stay at Mt. St. Mary’s.

Msgr. Swetland, who was ordained for the diocese of Peoria IL in 1991 by Newark Archbishop John J. Myers (bishop of Peoria Diocese from 1990-2001), came to campus for a series of interviews in May 2010. Swetland is the host of EWTN’s Catholicism on Campus and a professor at Mt. St. Mary’s University in Emmitsburg, MD. Some at the university objected to Swetland’s candidacy, citing his lack of administrative experience. They also contended that he was being seriously considered a finalist only because of his friendship with Archbishop Myers.

Swetland was offered the job of president of Seton Hall. During the course of confidential contract negotiations, some university officials leaked specific details about the contract discussion, including a reported $300,000 annual salary. Sheeran earned about $31,000 per year. At the same time, the faculty senate, which represents each of the university’s colleges, circulated a statement urging the Board of Regents to reopen the search to seek candidates with more administrative experience and to laypeople. Citing his discernment that the Lord was calling him to stay at Mt. St. Mary’s (MD) and expressing his disappointment that the confidential contract discussion had been compromised, Swetland withdrew his candidacy.

While other New Jersey Catholic colleges in the area have gone from having priests and religious serving as president to laypeople, Seton Hall has not. The Board of Regents had limited its search to clergy for two reasons: the by-laws of the university require that the president is a priest and the Board’s feeling that a priest-president best serves the university’s mission.

4. Mission Control? At the beginning of this series, I said that there seems to be a battle going on for the university’s soul: a battle between Catholic thought and values and those of the secular world. It’s human nature to want to draw clear lines and assign parts in this drama: “liberal” faculty forces vs. a “conservative” archbishop, or the money a Division 1 sports program can bring in vs. goodness and integrity. I’m not so sure that accurately depicts what’s going on here.

The university has a lot going for it in terms of “orthodoxy cred.” The Office of Mission and Ministry at the University seems to be trying to do a lot of good things, overseeing: The Catholic Center for Family Life and Spirituality, The G.K. Chesteron Institute for Faith and Culture, the Institute for Christian Spirituality, and others.

What I think we have at Seton Hall is a split-personality disorder. There seems to be a culture there that doesn’t recognize that to be intellectually honest and rigorous and truly Catholic are not mutually exclusive things. The Seminary and the Mission and Identity haven’t been successful in permeating the entire culture at Seton Hall.

What Seton Hall needs to do, and it is not too far gone to do, is to examine itself through the lens of Ex Corde Ecclesiae, Pope John Paul II’s apostolic constitution on Catholic higher education (In its press packet, the Cardinal Newman Society has a good breakdown of the guidelines and analysis of what has happened at Catholic colleges in the United States in the 20 years since Ex Corde was published.). Seton Hall doesn’t seem to have truly embraced the following:

“A Catholic university, as Catholic, informs and carries out its research, teaching, and all other activities with Catholic ideals, principles and attitudes. …Catholic teaching and discipline are to influence all university activities, while the freedom of conscience of each person is to be fully respected. Any official action or commitment of the university is to be in accord with its Catholic identity.”

Catholic ideals, principles, and attitudes are not being reflected across the board at Seton Hall. Catholic attitudes and principles were not on display during the coaching tenure of Bobby Gonzalez. Having a priest sit on your bench during games (like the team chaplain, Msgr. Liddy does) doesn’t mean that your coach and his or her players are living Catholic attitudes and principles, and it doesn’t make up for distinctly un-Christian behavior.

Can a course on gay marriage be offered at a Catholic university that is living up to Catholic ideals, principles, and actions? Can such a course be offered in a completely balanced way, showing how the Church teaches that people who self-identify as gay must be treated with dignity and respect and are called, just like every other human being, to live a chaste life within God’s ordered creation and that the Church teaches that gay marriage goes against the natural law? It’s hard to imagine that an openly gay professor who has advocated for the gay lifestyle would be able to accomplish this.

This struggle between the secular forces and Catholic mission forces is very evident in the failed search for a replacement for Msgr. Robert Sheeran this past year. Based on Msgr. Swetland’s background and his involvement with EWTN’s “Catholicism on Campus,” one might conclude that Msgr. Swetland might try to guide Seton Hall into a place where it resides more firmly within Ex Corde’s guidelines. Some have seen in Swetland’s candidacy the hand of Archbishop Myers trying to bring Seton Hall closer to Ex Corde.

What can the Archbishop do about Seton Hall University? The truth is, Archbishop Myers can do very little in an overt way, so there is no smackdown on the way. The Archdiocese does not own Seton Hall, even though it is a diocesan university. Archbishop Myers does sit on two very important boards, but he doesn’t have absolute control over them. He can advocate and he can preach, but he does not have direct control over the daily happenings at the University. That is the job of the President.

What can we, Jane and Joe Catholic sitting in the pews, do to save not just this Catholic university, but all Catholic colleges and universities in danger of losing their souls? First, we must pray. We must ask the intercession of the saints in whose names these schools were founded for the conversion of the campuses. We must pray for the clergy and religious who are running these schools. We must pray for those who are trying to effect positive change at these schools. We must pray for lukewarm souls to be set on fire for Christ once again.

If we are alumni of these Catholic colleges in trouble, we must make our feelings known and vote with our wallets. We need to show the people on the boards and the presidents of these colleges that following the guidelines of Ex Corde means something to us and that we will either give or withhold giving based on how well they do that.

We also need to understand what following the guidelines established by Ex Corde means. People tend to focus on the mandatum oath, whose theology professors have taken it and whose haven’t (From Ex Corde: Catholic theologians “are to be faithful to the Magisterium of the Church as the authentic interpreter of Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition.” Every professor of Catholic theology must have a “mandate” (mandatum) from the local bishop, as required in the 1983 Code of Canon Law.”). While the mandatum is crucial, it’s only one part of the guidelines and isn’t a guarantee of a holistically Catholic college. The National Catholic Register/Faith and Family Magazine College survey is an excellent resource which asks the colleges to self- report on all of the guidelines established by Ex Corde Ecclesiae. The Newman Guide is indispensable in helping Catholic families choose a Catholic College.

Finally, we need to support the bishops who are working to clean these colleges up. We need to encourage them with cards, letters and emails, and we especially need to pray for them. Our bishops need to know that we think that Catholic colleges and universities are important to all the faithful, to our country, and to the world. Our bishops need to know that we believe that the colleges and universities who would call themselves Catholic need to project a strong Catholic identity for the world to see.

President Remote Control

During the 2008 campaign season, I marveled about the ability of the candidate and the campaign to stay 'on message.' For sure, the messages which candidate Obama offered were the zealously vague platitudes of hope and change, but it served as the perfect counterpoint to the frustrations most of had with the Bush administration. For many, John McCain embodied all the things we disliked about the Bush administration with fewer of its virtues. Hope and change were the right messages and they were delivered with monotonous effectiveness. With Obama, the candidate and the campaign got it and they stuck to it. And they won.

Baseball fans are all familiar with the tale of the rookie season and the sophomore jinx. A rookie pitcher breaks into the major league and he seems, during his first time through the league, to be virtually un-hitable. But then, as the seasoned professionals have seen him a few times, he is suddenly hitable. He loses the mystique and he struggles. Sometimes they fade away to obscurity unable to adapt and sometimes they expand and grow and find new ways to fool their opponents and stay on top of their game.

President Obama shows all the signs of the sophomore jinx and, for now, few signs of the adaptation and growth necessary for a long and successful career in the major leagues.

I watched this weekend as the President took some time from his umpteenth vacation to sit down with the usual suscepts to deal with message. (No, I didn't spell that wrong)

First President Obama was asked about a poll which showed that one in five Americans questions whether he is a Christian. His answer reveals. “I can’t spend all of my time with my birth certificate plastered on my forehead.”

The question was about his faith, his answer about his birthplace and citizenship. Regardless of what that tells you, it tells me something bad about this President. This type of remark has become all too commonplace in the last 18 months. A diversion. And a bad one.

So much of what made Obama seem un-hitable just 20 months ago now makes him seem aloof and unconcerned. His ballyhooed coolness, an attribute which wowed wispy conservatives, has now made just about everyone post-oil-spill (even James Carville), either baffled or bitter. Coolness in the face of your hardship is virtue, coolness in the face of others' hardship--vice.

Even the President's storied speechifying now grates. In speech after speech, his robotic tones reveal nothing. Let me be clear--they are, like his teleprompter, utterly predictable. During the critical healthcare debate, Obama grudgingly deigned to discourse on the topic and when he did his dictatorial tone revealed his impatience with having to tell us stupid children the same thing over and over when what he really wants to say is "Because I said so.." The problem was never their plan, it was always our collective inability to perceive its greatness. "The election is over, John."

In fact the only time that we see any truth, any realness in Obama is when he is being thin skinned.

This brings me to another comment of the President this weekend. Asked about the "Restoring Honor" rally, Obama dismissed it saying "It’s not surprising that someone like a Mr. Beck is able to stir up a certain portion of [the American people.]" Regardless of what you think of Mr. Beck, hundreds of thousands of people on the mall praying for the restoration of this country is a big deal. Why not say that you share some of their concerns? Is that too much to ask? Aloof does not even begin to describe it. The president only served to solidify the opinion that many Americans share. He doesn't care.

This president will do what he wants and will ask our opinion only when he wants it. Apparently, this is government of the people and bye people. His is the imperial presidency that many have feared. Controlling of the people while remaining steadfastly remote from them. President Remote Control.

Absent from any of Obama's action or rhetoric is the ability to adapt to new realities. Without such adaption in approach or rhetoric, the American people will see each pitch for its rookie season sameness. President Remote Control will reveal himself as a flash in the pan and John and Jane Q. will reluctantly conclude that it is time to cut our losses.

Back in 2008, Obama and his campaign understood that message matters. What he fails to understand is that in 2010, it still does.