Creative Minority Reader
Today on CMR —
TwitterCounter for

Bishop: Obama Said 'To Hell with Catholics!"

Bishop David A. Zubik of the Diocese of Pittsburg wrote a response to the recent outrageous HHS mandate. And it's scathing. And perfect. And a must read.

Here it is:

It is really hard to believe that it happened. It comes like a slap in the face. The Obama administration has just told the Catholics of the United States, “To Hell with you!” There is no other way to put it.

In early August, the Department for Health and Human Services in the Obama administration released guidelines as part of the implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The guidelines mandated that by Summer 2012 all individual and group health insurance plans, including self-insured plans, cover all FDA-approved contraception, sterilization procedures and pharmaceuticals that even result in abortion.

A million things are wrong with this: equating pregnancy with disease; mandating that every employer pay for contraception procedures including alleged contraceptives that are actually abortion-inducing drugs; forcing American citizens to chose between violating their consciences or providing health care services; mandating such coverage on every individual woman without allowing her to even choose not to have it; forcing every person to pay for that coverage no matter the dictates of their conscience.

Let’s be blunt. This whole process of mandating these guidelines undermines the democratic process itself. In this instance, the mandate declares pregnancy a disease, forces a culture of contraception and abortion on society, all while completely bypassing the legislative process.

This is government by fiat that attacks the rights of everyone – not only Catholics; not only people of all religion. At no other time in memory or history has there been such a governmental intrusion on freedom not only with regard to religion, but even across-the-board with all citizens. It forces every employer to subsidize an ideology or pay a penalty while searching for alternatives to heath care coverage. It undermines the whole concept and hope for health care reform by inextricably linking it to the zealotry of pro-abortion bureaucrats.

For our Church this mandate would apply in virtually every instance where the Catholic Church serves as an employer. The mandate would require the Catholic Church as an employer to violate its fundamental beliefs concerning human life and human dignity by forcing Catholic entities to provide contraceptive, sterilization coverage and even pharmaceuticals that result in abortion.

There was a so-called “religious exemption” to the mandate, but it was so narrowly drawn that, as critics charged, Jesus Christ and his Apostles would not fit the exemption. The so-called exemption would only apply to the vast array of Catholic institutions where the following applied:

•Only Catholics are employed;
•The primary purpose of the institution or service provided is the direct instruction in Catholic belief;
•The only persons served by the institution are those that share Catholic religious tenets. (Try to fit this in with our local Catholic Charities that serve 80,000 every year without discrimination according to faith. It would be impossible!)
Practically speaking under the proposed mandate there would be no “religious exemption” for Catholic hospitals universities, colleges, nursing homes and numerous Catholic social service agencies such as Catholic Charities. It could easily be determined that the “religious exemption” would not apply as well to Catholic high schools, elementary schools and Catholic parishes since many employ non-Catholics and serve both students and, through social outreach, many who do not share Catholic religious beliefs. Such a narrow “religious exemption” is simply unprecedented in federal law.

Last September I asked you to protest those guidelines to Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of the U.S. Department for Health and Human Services, and contact your political leadership in the federal government. I asked that you request that this flawed mandate be withdrawn because of its unprecedented interference in the religious liberty and freedom of conscience of the Catholic community, and our basic democratic process.

You did. And you were joined by Catholics throughout the country (and many others as well) who raised their voices against the mandate, raised their voices against a meaningless religious exemption.

On January 20, 2012, the Obama administration answered you and me. The response was very simple: “To Hell with You.”

Kathleen Sebelius announced that the mandate would not be withdrawn and the religious exemption would not be expanded. Instead, she stated that nonprofit groups – which include the Catholic Church – will get a year “to adapt to this new rule.” She simply dismissed Catholic concerns as standing in the way of allegedly respecting the health concerns and choices of women.

Could Catholics be insulted any more, suggesting that we have no concern for women’s health issues? The Catholic Church and the Catholic people have erected health care facilities that are recognized worldwide for their compassionate care for everyone regardless of their creed, their economic circumstances and, most certainly, their gender. In so many parts of the globe – the United States included – the Church is health care.

Kathleen Sebelius and through her, the Obama administration, have said “To Hell with You” to the Catholic faithful of the United States.

•To Hell with your religious beliefs,
•To Hell with your religious liberty,
•To Hell with your freedom of conscience.
We’ll give you a year, they are saying, and then you have to knuckle under. As Cardinal-designate Timothy Dolan, archbishop of New York and president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops responded, “in effect, the president is saying that we have a year to figure out how to violate our consciences.”

As I wrote to you last September, with this mandate the democratic process is being ignored while we are being ordered to ignore our religious beliefs. And we are being told not only to violate our beliefs, but to pay directly for that violation; to subsidize the imposition of a contraceptive and abortion culture on every person in the United States.

It is time to go back to work. They have given us a year to adapt to this rule. We can’t! We simply cannot!

Write to the president.

Write to Secretary Sebelius.

Write to our Senators.

Write to those in Congress.


HT Diocese of Pittsburgh

New Movie "The Vatican" Sure to Thrill Anti-Catholics

Hollywood will be making a movie about The Vatican. What could go wrong?

Everything. And it's even worse than you think.

Continue reading at the National Catholic Register>>>

It Damn Well Is Worth Getting Angry About!

Watch this video from tonight's GOP debate and answer me these questions. Why the hell is Santorum not leading the polls and what the hell is wrong with Mitt Romney. Obamacare is not worth getting angry about? Unreal. Please someone spare us from this fate.



Santorum absolutely dismantles Romney on the mandate issue and Romney is absolutely clueless, CLUELESS, about the principles involved.

Greatest College Sports Recruiting Vid...Evah!!!

This video is just too awesome not to share. It became an unintended hit on the Youtubes the last few days. Benedictine University in Chicago made this video and it looks like their video guys just got themselves hold of some green screen. You've got a baseball shattering the moon. You've got a girl spiking a volleyball so hard it goes through the earth's core and comes out in China. And oh yeah, the leaning Tower of Pisa gets striaghtened out too. It's like something Michael bay would've produced when he was eight.

It's a good thing this video is for their athletic department rather than their film department.

It's your must watch video of the day.
Ht Deadspin

Syance Sez I M Not Zo Smart

A bunch of reeel smarty pants type peeple who wear glassus and everything say ur dumb. Yup. If ur consurvative, your IQ is lowur than your tipical Occupy Wall Street geenyus.

Here it is. Lyve Syunce reports:

The research finds that children with low intelligence are more likely to hold prejudiced attitudes as adults. These findings point to a vicious cycle, according to lead researcher Gordon Hodson, a psychologist at Brock University in Ontario. Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, the study found. Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice, Hodson wrote in an email to LiveScience.

"Prejudice is extremely complex and multifaceted, making it critical that any factors contributing to bias are uncovered and understood," he said.

The findings combine three hot-button topics.

"They've pulled off the trifecta of controversial topics," said Brian Nosek, a social and cognitive psychologist at the University of Virginia who was not involved in the study. "When one selects intelligence, political ideology and racism and looks at any of the relationships between those three variables, it's bound to upset somebody."

Polling data and social and political science research do show that prejudice is more common in those who hold right-wing ideals that those of other political persuasions, Nosek told LiveScience.

"The unique contribution here is trying to make some progress on the most challenging aspect of this," Nosek said, referring to the new study. "It's not that a relationship like that exists, but why it exists."
Gotta' luv syance. Its not a queshtun weather conservutives r dumb. But y.

Hey i's syance. Hoo r we to queshtun it?

October Baby

It's the story of Hannah, a 19 year old girl who discovers she survived an attempted abortion when her mother was seven months pregnant.

The story is loosely based on what happened in real life to Gianna Jessen and it stars Bo Duke. Hope it is good.

Erin Go Blech!

The funny Bad Vestments site has this bad St. Paddy's day gift idea.

BV recommends that if you have an Irish priest friend, buy him a bottle of Bushmills instead. I second that.

You Open With "I Killed Bin Laden?"

There have been many reviews of the President's SOTU address the other night and there is general agreement that it was a weak performance. This is validated by the fact that even his fanboys are giving him crud.

Take Jon Stewart, he ridicules the President for opening with "Did you hear? I got Bin Laden." Then says, "What else you got?"

The Absurdity Of Abortion Language

The absurdity of abortion language is on full display in this great little ad. "So, is this your first clump of cells?"



ht Catholic Vote

Class Warfare at Its Saddest

This is pretty hilarious. I'm not a Mitt Romney guy but truly, this is class warfare at its worst. I mean worst as in just so poorly done as to be laughable.

Brad Woodhouse, the Democratic Party Communication Director sent out an email blasting Mitt Romney for being rich and out of touch but he says the Dems have a plan that shows how in touch they are:

After repeated calls, yesterday Mitt Romney released one year of his tax returns.

Even with this partial picture, one thing is abundantly clear: Mitt plays by very different rules than most Americans do.

He made $22 million in 2010 and paid just 13.9% in taxes on it -- about half of what most middle-class Americans pay. And under his tax plan, he'd pay even less.

That's the GOP plan. And last night, you saw ours.

In the State of the Union, President Obama told Congress he'll continue to fight for the Buffett Rule.
Ha! Romney's plan is the plan of a millionaire who's out of touch so the Dems have a plan they call the Buffet rule. Yeah, Warren Buffet. The Billionaire.

Someone should've thought about that email a little bit longer before pressing "send."

And mind you, the reason Romney paid 13.9% in taxes is because he gave so much away in charity.

He raked in about $42 million in 2010 and 2011. He paid $6.2 million to the taxman and donated a staggering $7 million to charity. That's 16% of his income to charity.

In 2007, the Obamas gave about 5.7 per cent of their income. The Bidens gave an average of $369 to charity a year for the decade before he became Vice President - about 0.3 percent of their income.

But somehow Mitt is the patrician jerk who is out of touch with regular people, according to the Dems. It's just like when Mitt gave $50 to a woman in need, all the Dems chortled because he actually gave his own money. They critiqued him for not supporting a government program. So you see, if you give your own money to help people you're a jerk who probably has too much money. But if you support forcing people to giving the government money so the elites can dole it out then you're a hero. Like Warren Buffet.

Popular Posts