"Nothing is more dreaded than the national government meddling with religion." John Adams

Featured Posts


Creative Minority Reader

Cardinal George on the Motu Proprio

John Allen Jr. of NCR has a wide ranging interview with Cardinal George of Chicago. In it, Allen asks the Cardinal about the motu proprio Summorum Pontificum. I have excerpted those questions and answers here with my emphases and [comments].

Speaking of discordant notes in our unity, the Holy Father’s recent motu proprio broadening permission for celebration of the pre-Vatican II Latin Mass has generated some controversy. In Chicago, do you anticipate widespread use of the old Mass?

Since you have over half the presbyterate who really can’t handle Latin, I don’t see huge numbers. Among the others who could handle it, they made a decision after the council that they’re not going to use Latin again. For them, it’s a matter of principle that they wouldn’t use it. [Hmm? Is that a valid principle? Can a priest validly object to Latin on principle?] Therefore, ‘widespread’ isn’t going to happen, I don’t think, at least for the next several years. We have it now, it’s built up over the years, where people have asked for it in five different places in five different parts of the city. Every Sunday, maybe 3,000 people worship God using the old missal.

That was prior to the motu proprio?

Yes.

Any increase after the motu proprio?

I had one priest say that maybe I’d like to start it in my parish, and we’re talking about that. It depends on how many people want it, it depends on whether when he goes away we can find somebody who can continue it or not. We’re discussing whether this is a good thing to do. He’s not too far from other places where it’s celebrated, but he says my parishioners want it in my parish. We’re talking about that now. Maybe in a couple of places in the diocese where it’s not really accessible, such as the southwestern corner and a few other places, we might look at that. [I must admit that I am confused. This all still sounds like it is entirely up to the Bishop. Sort of an Ecclesia Dei Plus. If the Priest is capable and people want it, he can do it. No?] But I haven’t seen wide demand. Nobody’s written me letters saying, ‘Ah, now at last we can do this.’ So far, there is no such reaction. We are going to be sure that the seminarians, when they do their practicum on the new Mass, also receive some instruction about what the Tridentine rite looks like, so it’s not foreign to them. It’s the extraordinary expression of the Roman rite, so they should know it. [Excellent! As it should be.] Many of them, I suspect, won’t really be prepared to celebrate it. We demand more Latin of them now. They must have at least two years, and that’s been the case for some years. But that’s perhaps not enough to actually celebrate it, and the bishop has to be sure that the priest-celebrant can actually celebrate.[Hmmm. See Father Z. for what idoneous means.]

Even if they don’t do it publically, do you see more of your priests celebrating the old Mass privately?

I have no indication that they’re doing that, or that they would want to do that. There might be a few. I could think of several, but you could count them, I think, on two hands .… maybe one hand.

Prior to the release of the motu proprio, I wrote an op/ed piece for the New York Times in which I argued that this would be one of those classic Vatican documents which, because of its symbolic importance, generates a lot of debate, but practically changes little on the ground.Does that seem right to you?

We’ll see, but it made sense to me when I read it, and it still makes sense to me now. Symbolically, it is important, mostly because the pope wants to insist that there was no rupture [between the pre- and post-Vatican II periods], and it shouldn’t have been treated as a rupture. The old Mass is there now, extraordinary but nonetheless present, as a kind of template to draw people into perhaps a more reverential celebration of the Eucharist. [OK.]It’s there, and that’s helpful. On the other hand, most of the practicing Catholics I know, including those in my own family, who have always been good Mass-goers and who have nothing against the Tridentine rite, remember it and appreciate it, but they say, ‘We’re somewhere else now.’ [Yes, but where are we?]

In other words, they wouldn’t want to do it every Sunday.

Yes, yes. It’s available, and it’s readily available in Chicago, and might be more available, but it’s always going to be what the pope called it: ‘extraordinary.’

Your Ad Here

5 comments:

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Patrick Archbold said...

I do not like to have to delete comments. It is fair to critique and/or analyze a Bishop for something he says, but this blog does not go in for labeling all Bishops as modernists and questioning the validity of the ordinary form. Not here. If you wish to be constructive you will have no issue from me, bu these types of posts will not be permitted.

Anonymous said...

So you want to "critique" a bishop who is using every excuse in the book for not allowing a true valid rite of worship, but not critique the source-modernism

Sort of like trying to cure cancer without removing or attending to the effected organ or origin

So on we go with more wishy washy trying to find the cause of this horrible state of affairs in the church today where what would have been considered heresy only 50 years ago is accepted as the norm, without calling such what it is

Chironomo said...

One thing that I hear from this, other than the obvious attempts by the interviewer to get the Bishop to say that the Motu proprio is really not important, is the view that the MP is not going to have a big impact immediately, butthat it may begin to have a much greater impact as time progresses. For instance - "Therefore, ‘widespread’ isn’t going to happen, I don’t think, at least for the next several years" seems to indicate that the Cardinal feels that once the word spreads, and newer priests are given the opportunity to train in the Rite, and seinarians begin instruction in the ordinary form as a part of their formation, there may come a time when there is a more widespread use of the EF. I have heard similar statements from other officials such as "in the near future" or "no immediate effect in this diocese"...I guess that they are leaving open the possibility that they could find themselves in a quickly changng situation and have to eat their words, which no church official likes to do!

Post a Comment