The Fluffy Bunny is Racist
Without any evidence whatsoever, the Associated Press has accused Sarah Palin of being racist and then without worrying about sexism they called her a "fluffy bunny."
By now we all know that Sarah Palin has been raising the connection between William Ayers and Obama. Ayers is, of course, the man in charge of The Weather Underground which bombed the Pentagon, killed police officers, and other sorted and sundry crimes.
Obama served on boards with this man and kicked off his political career with a meet and greet in Ayers' living room. Mind you, Ayers is white.
But here's the AP lede:
By claiming that Democrat Barack Obama is "palling around with terrorists" and doesn't see the U.S. like other Americans, vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin targeted key goals for a faltering campaign.Racially tinged, how? Here's how the writer explains:
And though she may have scored a political hit each time, her attack was unsubstantiated and carried a racially tinged subtext that John McCain himself may come to regret.
Palin's words avoid repulsing voters with overt racism. But is there another subtext for creating the false image of a black presidential nominee "palling around" with terrorists while assuring a predominantly white audience that he doesn't see their America?The writer then invites a Democratic strategist to level some hatred of Palin:
In a post-Sept. 11 America, terrorists are envisioned as dark-skinned radical Muslims, not the homegrown anarchists of Ayers' day 40 years ago. With Obama a relative unknown when he began his campaign, the Internet hummed with false e-mails about ties to radical Islam of a foreign-born candidate.
Whether intended or not by the McCain campaign, portraying Obama as "not like us" is another potential appeal to racism. It suggests that the Hawaiian-born Christian is, at heart, un-American.
"It's a giant changing of the subject," said Jenny Backus, a Democratic strategist. "The problem is the messenger. If you want to start throwing fire bombs, you don't send out the fluffy bunny to do it. I think people don't take Sarah Palin seriously."Now, of course, calling Sarah Palin a bunny isn't sexist, is it?
So let's make sure I've got this. Sarah Palin's a racist because she points out a connection with a terrorist but the Associated Press can have someone in their report refer to Palin as a "bunny" and not an eyebrow is raised. Hmmmm?















13 comments:
Yeah, that's exactly right. /sarcasm
If Governor Palin is a bunny, then, his rather bizarre eyebrows and makeup job, is it all right to call Senator Biden a Klingon named Blork?
-- Mack
Oh, I soooooooo botched the sentence structure. Well, I guess I'm confused because of all the time I've spent trying to sort out the Fluffy Bunnies and the Klingons.
-- Mack
We all got the joke anyway.
Unless, of course, she's the bunny from Monty Python . . . Then it fits.
Palin's words avoid repulsing voters with overt racism. But is there another subtext for creating the false image of a black presidential nominee "palling around" with terrorists while assuring a predominantly white audience that he doesn't see their America?
This sounds like the Post-Modern Essay Generator. If Obama wins, people like this are going to be in charge. In college in the 90's, we were constantly pestered with this reduction of reality to a language game. Now imagine it graduated from college and moving into the political arena. blech.
One mistake in your post. Ayer's group never actually killed any police officers. They tried to, but the nail bomb they were building to do that killed two of their members.
Thank God they were inept terrorists.
Jeff,
From the New York Times
"Most of the bombs the Weathermen were blamed for had been placed to do only property damage, a fact Mr. Ayers emphasizes in his memoir. But a 1970 pipe bomb in San Francisco attributed to the group killed one police officer and severely hurt another."
They did have another bomb they were working on kill their own, but the did kill a cop.
This article is so lame, I'd really be interested in its origination and author. Any links you can provide?
It really sounds more of an op/ed than a news article. To claim most people associate terrorists with "dark-skinned" people is in itself a racist statement coming from the article's author, and says much more about him/her than anything.
The link is in the first reference to the Associated Press. It's not showing up the way it normally does but click on it and it'll take you there.
Matthew - got it. And thanks. Yes, it really is appalling, ESPECIALLY in its entirety. A VERY worthwhile analysis-of-the-analysis should be read Here Not surprisingly, the title of the article was even worse when it originally went out (I'm not going to repeat it here, but it's at the link if you're interested).
thanks for the news. Keep it coming.
To vote for a candidate only because of the color of his skin is just as racist as to NOT vote for him because of the color of his skin!
Kate Asjes
Kate, what a perfectly racist statement! I mean, sure Barack comes from an elite white southern family on his mother's side who previously held African slaves. And sure, on his fathers side he comes from a priveleged tribe in Kenya (the second largest). And sure, no one from his family never suffered from segregation or fought during the civil rights movement or has anything to do with the American black experience.
The fact is, his skin is dark so we must vote for him! We owe him that much!
(and please see that I was joking with you, so no offense : )
Post a Comment