"Nothing is more dreaded than the national government meddling with religion." John Adams

Featured Posts


Creative Minority Reader

My Daughter Was Asked Out By a Boy!!!

My 14 year old daughter was asked out by a boy.

This is a first for me. Yes, it's a big deal. I've had five kids. Now I have four kids and a teenager...who gets asked out by boys!!! Well "boy" in the singular but "Boys!!!!" sounds more dramatic so...

Don't worry. My daughter said no. Wait. She didn't actually say "no." She said "My Dad would kill me and probably you too." And I'm ok with that. I'm ok with being the bad guy. She didn't tell the guy that she didn't want anything to do with him, she just said that my father is a lunatic and its probably best if we don't do anything to provoke him. And once again, I'm ok with that. It's a way of letting them down easy with an implied threat of dismemberment.

Please continue reading at The National Catholic Register>>>


*subhead*Bad guy.*subhead*

Your Ad Here

28 comments:

Patrick Archbold said...

So sorry

Patrick Archbold said...

Yup down boy

Patrick Archbold said...

Current heresy, definitely. But I think some of the old faithful (ha ha) pretty much sprang up at once and have never gone away...

Patrick Archbold said...

What a heretical cunt! The fruits of the Judas council indeed!

Patrick Archbold said...

Maybe we should stop so aggressively

attack him and allow him to think about it. People just escalate conflict. What if our attacks will have an opposite effect?

Patrick Archbold said...

Thought maybe you were just relieved that it was a boy and not a girl...:-)

Patrick Archbold said...

Be good for her confidence! Im nineteen and no one has ever asked me out. Flirted with me a bit, maybe even for a few days. But asked me out? Never. Kudos.

Patrick Archbold said...

This action of the Deacon not only are insulting and offensive but more seriously they actually violate Canon Law as well. I used to have a copy and under the section on Penalties for Specific Offences it clearly said any Catholic who uses a means of social communication to insult or slander a Pope is to be punished with a just penalty including dismissal from the clerical state. Its true Benedict is retired but he is still a Pope, so I think whoever his superior is should seriously consider this aspect.

Patrick Archbold said...

Graham, that language has no place in a Catholic discussion. I am outraged at Deacon Sandy's behavior, but that does not excuse your language. I urge you to try to be more moderate in your comments.

Patrick Archbold said...

Yes, some people have been aggressively attacking him. But, objectively, he is in the wrong. He should be shamed for his attack on PBXVI. He is not a child, after all. He is a grown man, and an ordained cleric in the Catholic Church. I must have missed the memo that said that you get to say whatever you want, ignoring the Church, because you are so very special.

I do not agree with the personal attacks. But, I absolutely agree with those who are saying that he is wrong in what he did. Because..he was wrong. He should apologize immediately and publicly for what he said. He should be ashamed for what he said.

Patrick Archbold said...

Shouldn't the boy's family be investigated? He was the one who exhibited evidence of heteronormative patriarchal thoughts. What kind of parents he must have!

Patrick Archbold said...

Aww, I thought it was time to clean the shotgun.

Patrick Archbold said...

Sure you are defending this old man for causing grave scandal and violating canon law in the Church.

What will you say next?? Who am I to Judge????? Sick bastard, how dare you disgrace a picture of the Pope and subject him to the laughter of your Satanic congregants and Dare to call yourself a Catholic Church! I am disgusted to see your videos on Father Z's website!

Patrick Archbold said...

Deacon Sandy Sites, you are a Heretical Cunt who will never achieve the level of the Theological Genius and caliber of Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI. You can remove all the kneelers that you want, dance all the liturgical prancing you want, chatter away the Liturgy of the Mass until Christ comes again, you are a low mortal Unfit to carry the title of a Deacon. You are the serpent slime that oozes out of the Judas Vatican Council and your disgusting apostasy is soon over! Count your days in your geriatric nursing home, I hope you find Satan before the incubus devours you!

Patrick Archbold said...

Your damn bishop is useless. Bishop fellay would throw him out to Timbuktu in a heartbeat. The honest reality is, your bishops are Weak and Spineless! They cannot even uphold Canon Law on the politicians and abortionists! Why? Because the world has changed, and we must all Progress in the honor of the Second Vatican Council

Archbishop Listecki is a spineless Mancunt! Weak excuse of a worm!

Patrick Archbold said...

The deacon has a fellow traveler in his slurs against Papa Benedict... A prince of the Church. as witnessed by these charming Tweets from a year ago: Cdl Roger Mahony, himself.

Patrick Archbold said...

How would you feel ostracized by the crowd and not be able to respond?

Patrick Archbold said...

He responded with a LIE. As a deacon, is he THAT ignorant not to know that the Pope does wear red shoes and white vestments. If that's truly the case, what ignorant deacons we really have today!

NO, his deceitful ways does not fool us. He knew and he knew it well. If you want him to get a Free pass as a martyr well you go right ahead. What will the rest of people say again??? Who am I to judge????

What a disastrous year it is for loyal and obedient Catholics. I cannot believe what a spineless bishop they have in that diocese!

Patrick Archbold said...

BIshop Fellay has clearly stated that we will NEVER accept the Judas Vatican Council.

You can shove the Novus Ordo to the Protestants. We will never savor it.

Patrick Archbold said...

I'm still undecided if Sandy is a heretic or an apostate. Anyone who acts as such and claims to be Catholic is a wolf in sheep's clothing or a coward who hides behind the cloak.
Too bad if his feelings are hurt. Catholics are not meant to be crybabies. Is this the way Christ acted, who took up his cross, knowing his fate?

Patrick Archbold said...

As a deacon, I believe that Deacon Sandy needs a sabbatical retreat...a long sabbatical retreat. BTW, Deacon Sandy, the days of the Kumbaya Church of the 60's is over.

Patrick Archbold said...

Proof is in the pudding. Deacon Sandy has been called out on his horrible error. Now, can he apologize for doing this? If not, why? The problem is no longer with people pointing it out, but his failure to grasp what he just did.

Patrick Archbold said...

sorry, don't give a damn what "Bishop Fellay" says. He is not the Bishop of Rome...We have a Pope..don't like him? Who cares? You can just be an apostate if you like. Your choice..

Patrick Archbold said...

I looked up "fine vestments" and I did NOT find this picture. I looked up Pope Benedict red shoes and I DID find this exact picture. I think the Reverend Mr. Sandy knew exactly what he was doing.

Patrick Archbold said...

I'm surprised the priest didn't stop the "homily" at that point. BTW the role of a deacon is not to preach all the time, but to do works of charity in persona christi. Deacons are only supposed to preach in exceptional circumstances. Time to stop yapping and get doing.

Patrick Archbold said...

I feel this Deacon is a person who never cares for knowledge,wisdom,humility,respect,tolerance and love.Let us not accuse him, let us pray for God,s mercy on him to give wisdom and humility. Whatever be , such persons should not be allowed to give sermon. I can exchange a word of love if I can get his email id.

Patrick Archbold said...

St. Francis was a deacon who was never ordained because he felt unworthy to be a priest. There were no permanent deacons at that time. Permanent deacons today seem to be clerics who felt that the lay life was unworthy of them.
The permanent diaconate was a way to get the "camel's nose under the tent" in the wish of many of the attendees at Vatican II to ordain married men.
Priests only recently invented day to day "headaches" in their "jobs." The priesthood is a calling to sacrifice and privation; a life in service. The married state is the same except that the service is to the man's family for the good of the Church. These two callings are mutually exclusive.

Patrick Archbold said...

In June 1988 Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre announced his intention to consecrate Fellay and three other priests as bishops. Lefebvre did not have a pontifical mandate for these consecrations (i.e. permission from the pope), normally required by Canon 1382 of the Code of Canon Law. On 17 June 1988 Cardinal Bernardin Gantin, prefect of the Congregation for Bishops sent Fellay a formal canonical warning that he would automatically incur the penalty of excommunication if he were ordained by Lefebvre without papal permission.

On 30 June 1988 Fellay and the three other priests were consecrated bishop by Archbishop Lefebvre. On 1 July 1988 Cardinal Gantin issued a declaration stating that Lefebvre, Fellay, and the three other newly-ordained bishops "have incurred ipso facto the excommunication latae sententiae reserved to the Apostolic See".

Post a Comment